http://malaysia.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080514192800AAPIImD
The guy who has been denoted as the “Best Answerer” answers my question in full. He specifically says that the pay was a dive and that the paperwork sucks, but even though he originally planned to teach for only two years, he is still a teacher. The benefits must outweigh the negatives. There is no other explanation. Besides, if they didn’t, why would anyone become a teacher?
1 response so far ↓
1 Eric // May 19, 2008 at 9:08 am
The guy who has been denoted has the “Best Answerer” answers my question in full.
This sentence doesn’t make sense.
Leave a Comment